Archive for November, 2008

David G. Byro

Environmental Scientist, Office of Environmental Innovation, Environmental Assessment and Innovation Division,US Environmental Protection Agency

(David Byro will be working in the Philippines from September 28 – December 18. The U.S. Embassy is pleased to organize his schedule and offer his skills to different Philippine government agencies, private enterprise, educational institutions, and interested non-government organizations. You may contact him in Manila: c/o Economic Section, US Embassy, Manila, Roxas Boulevard, City of Manila. Telephone: 301-2000 extn 5242, Email: (pre 12/18/08) ; (post 12/18/08)

Relevant Experience

Developed in-country experience in conservation of marine resources while putting B.S. degree in Biological Oceanography to practice as a fisheries volunteer in the Philippines from 1981 – 1983.

Published paper on fisheries project in Bais City, Negros Oriental. Fluent in Bisayan (Cebuano) and basic Pilipino.

Served as dive master and scientific diver on intermittent marine and fresh water research projects.

Expertise in the transfer of EPA’s innovative environmental technologies programs (Environmental Technology Verification/Small Business Innovation Research) and will assist in exploring alternative energy options.

Developed and operated the first regional Business Assistance Center in the US including the creation of a strong network of industry, state, local and third party business assistance providers to facilitate collaborative projects with industry. The Business Assistance Center’s focus is to provide compliance assistance, promote pollution prevention and encourage the development of innovative environmental technologies

Current Areas of Expertise:

– development and operation of Business Assistance Center, focused on improving environmental compliance in the private small business sector through collaborative industry partnerships.

– multi-media regulatory and technical assistance and innovative technology development

-dive master and scientific diver on intermittent marine and fresh water research projects

Previous Professional International Experience:

1981 – 1983 Philippines Fisheries Peace Corps Volunteer

June 1995 Philippines Project scoping for EPA’s and USAID’s US Asian Environmental Partnership

project on the Butuanon River


Drexel University/US EPA Continuing Education, Philadelphia, PA,Aquatic Toxicology and Groundwater Hydrology courses 1986-1987

Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, B.S. Biological Oceanography 1977-1979

University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, Study toward a B.S. Biology


Reviving the Bais City Oyster Industry, ICLARM Newsletter, July 1983, Metro Manila, Philippines.

Philippines Oyster Project Opens Way for Small-Scale Farms, Fish Farming International, February 1983, London.

Areawide Implementation of Groundwater Institutional Controls at Superfund Sites, U.S. EPA, July 1991, Washington, D.C

Other Qualifications:

Scholarship: Earned academic Kopplemann scholarship (1976-1979).

Languages: Fluent in Cebuano (Scored 4.0 out of possible 5.0 in Peace Corps exam).

Certifications: 40 Hour Health and Safety/HAZWOPER ; Lead Auditor ISO14001 Environmental Management Systems; SCUBA/Dive Master; CPR; First Aid; AED


November 5, 2008 at 4:03 am Leave a comment

Getting It On With Innovation

Innovation, in some ways, is like the most stunning person in the room. People know he or she is there and want to make a move, but the fear of falling flat on one’s face (after costing you a lot of money) is also as palpable, even paralyzing.

And the latest article on innovation in the New York Times makes one’s approach even more daunting, and seem reckless even.  

Innovation, according to the article, “by its very nature…is inefficient.” But we all know that when times are hard, that life vest we put on is called Efficiency.

This is what’s frightening but invigorating with innovation—how it turns our beloved business beliefs and practices on their heads. Our post-capitalist age has drastically changed how we must perceive and understand our lives, our society and the marketplace to survive.

The article also proposes two types of settings a leader must cultivate side by side in the workplace when times are hard. There is the “factory farm,” which is governed by our much-beloved efficiency measures, and also the “greenhouses and experimental gardens,” where risky investments are cultivated.

However, we must remember that cultivating such a division also poses a risk to the company when the designated innovators decide to take root in some other company.  

There seems no cut-and-dried means of guaranteeing our investments in innovation will pay off, that we won’t fall flat on our faces. Thousands of print and online pages continue to be devoted to discussing innovation (this blog included), which tell us that while it is hot—and with good reason—a lot of people still get cold feet and need a good nudge towards it.

Even articles that advocate its immediate adoption refuse to be prescriptive, often showing binary arguments.

But at the same time, innovation gurus are also given to pithy statements that work like business mantras we hang on our walls, such as “Efficiency is for bean counters,” says Howard Lieberman of the Silicon Valley Innovation Institute in the same article. “Creativity doesn’t care about economic downturns.”

It is no neat trick, no easy flip, this innovation business. It is no mere application we install without question and then leave to run by itself.

Innovation is a concept, it is a mind-shift, it fosters a corporate culture that most of us think we can only read about and lust after from a distance.

Times change first before attitudes do. But those who choose to lie back or bury their heads in the ground are left reeling by the consequences of inaction.

Innovation demands that we pay attention and act now. Else we pay later.

What is telling about this article on innovation during a financial crisis is the insistence on balance, whether in terms of company values (e.g., balancing the risk that attends innovation with a questioning mindset) or targets (e.g., the short-term versus the long-term ones). This, at the very least, helps to demolish lingering biases against innovation as an imprudent business move during these tough times.  

November 3, 2008 at 6:47 am Leave a comment

November 2008
« Sep   Dec »


Recent Posts

Latest Tweets